<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: BREAKING&#8230; Straight Talk Express Derailed by AP</title>
	<atom:link href="http://theconservativepost.com/WordPress/?feed=rss2&#038;p=324" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://theconservativepost.com/WordPress/?p=324</link>
	<description>Defending the Moral Superiority of Rugged Individualism Against Collectivists of All Stripes</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 09 Sep 2010 00:33:22 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Scott Miller</title>
		<link>http://theconservativepost.com/WordPress/?p=324&#038;cpage=1#comment-268</link>
		<dc:creator>Scott Miller</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 02 Feb 2008 02:08:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://theconservativepost.com/WordPress/?p=324#comment-268</guid>
		<description>Speed,

Your a moron. You know nothing about the conservative movement. You come on this site pretending to be a Smuckabee supporter, and now your using the same class warfare rhetoric that McCain and the lib Democrats do?

The facts are there plain to see. McCain the lib is lying when he said he opposed the tax cuts for spending reasons. He&#039;s on the record as opposing them because of class warfare reasons, not spending. Now he&#039;s lying about his records, AND saying that the very same tax cuts should now be made permanent. Why make them permanent now? Don&#039;t they still favor the rich? Isn&#039;t spending still a moral issue?

Who exactly are you supporting in this race? Could there be a lib alliance going on here? McCain the lib, and Smuckabee the lib in 2008, right?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Speed,</p>
<p>Your a moron. You know nothing about the conservative movement. You come on this site pretending to be a Smuckabee supporter, and now your using the same class warfare rhetoric that McCain and the lib Democrats do?</p>
<p>The facts are there plain to see. McCain the lib is lying when he said he opposed the tax cuts for spending reasons. He&#8217;s on the record as opposing them because of class warfare reasons, not spending. Now he&#8217;s lying about his records, AND saying that the very same tax cuts should now be made permanent. Why make them permanent now? Don&#8217;t they still favor the rich? Isn&#8217;t spending still a moral issue?</p>
<p>Who exactly are you supporting in this race? Could there be a lib alliance going on here? McCain the lib, and Smuckabee the lib in 2008, right?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Speedzzter</title>
		<link>http://theconservativepost.com/WordPress/?p=324&#038;cpage=1#comment-263</link>
		<dc:creator>Speedzzter</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 01 Feb 2008 02:51:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://theconservativepost.com/WordPress/?p=324#comment-263</guid>
		<description>Isn&#039;t the cost of the Iraq war a &quot;spending&quot; issue? 

How is criticizing the composition of the 2001 tax cut (which in dollar value did go mostly to the high income earners who pay the most taxes) remotely inconsistent with criticizing tax cuts that are wholly detached from spending restraint. 

How can the AP know everything McCain said during the tax cut debates? Was his every word transcribed? (even his private discussions with other senators).   Is there solid proof that McCain never raised the excessive spending issue in 2001?

This sort of silly attack discredits the conservative movement.   There&#039;s plenty of things to criticize McCain about without manufacturing stuff like this. 

Of course, as many flip-flops as Romney has, those Eastern elite &quot;conservatives&quot; in the bag for Mitt (Levin, Rush etc.) certainly don&#039;t want anyone to focus on his record.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Isn&#8217;t the cost of the Iraq war a &#8220;spending&#8221; issue? </p>
<p>How is criticizing the composition of the 2001 tax cut (which in dollar value did go mostly to the high income earners who pay the most taxes) remotely inconsistent with criticizing tax cuts that are wholly detached from spending restraint. </p>
<p>How can the AP know everything McCain said during the tax cut debates? Was his every word transcribed? (even his private discussions with other senators).   Is there solid proof that McCain never raised the excessive spending issue in 2001?</p>
<p>This sort of silly attack discredits the conservative movement.   There&#8217;s plenty of things to criticize McCain about without manufacturing stuff like this. </p>
<p>Of course, as many flip-flops as Romney has, those Eastern elite &#8220;conservatives&#8221; in the bag for Mitt (Levin, Rush etc.) certainly don&#8217;t want anyone to focus on his record.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
